Very Large Telescope time lapse | GrrlScientist

This breathtaking time-lapse video was captured at the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile's Atacama Desert

Here's a stunning time-lapse video of the night sky south of the equator, a sight that will especially appeal to those of you who live in megacities, like my beloved home New York City, who rarely get to see a starry sky. However, more than "just" another time-lapse view of the night sky, this video provides a fascinating look at the equipment on the ground that astronomers use to look at the night sky. Because, when you think about it, Very Large Telescopes are equipment (albeit, very very large equipment!):

This video was captured by optics engineer Stéphane Guisard and astronomer José Francisco Salgado at the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile's Atacama Desert.

The European Southern Observatory has a twitter account: @ESO_Observatory

.

email:@gmail.com
twitter: @GrrlScientist

AstronomySpaceGrrlScientistguardian.co.uk

Boot up: Pentagon counts cyberattacks as war, Google kills of some APIs, and more

Plus Apple Mac users' 'false belief' over malware security, and has RIM finally surrendered the consumer market?

A quick burst of 7 links for you to chew over, as picked by the Technology team

Pentagon: Online Cyber Attacks Can Count as Acts of War >> WSJ.com

"The Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage coming from another country can constitute an act of war, a finding that for the first time opens the door for the U.S. to respond using traditional military force."

Spring cleaning for some of our APIs >> The official Google Code blog

Google kills off a number of its APIs - including Google Translate (which Eric Schmidt once said would help world peace. So what does killing it mean?)

Commenter: "i have a question: why should any developer, any company which wants to build a valuable product for the long term use any of your APIs ever again? As you can argument that some of these API do not get used as much as they used to be and there are better alternatives, this is obviously not true for the translate API, where you even state the shutdown is due to 'extensive abuse'."

Mac malware: same shizzle, different dizzle >> CounterMeasures

Rik Ferguson lays it down: "For many years now Mac users have believed themselves to be invulnerable to malware, and have been encouraged in this belief by Apple themselves on more than one occasion, or "Safeguard your data by doing nothing". This complacency leaves many Mac users with the mistaken belief that either Macs are not vulnerable to malware, or that none exists for their platform or both, impacting their ability to make informed decisions when downloading or installing new software, opening attachments or visiting questionable sites."

Good Job, RIM. You've Lost the Consumer Market >> AllThingsD

"Wunderlich Securities analyst Matthew Robison... handed RIM an ugly downgrade this week, slashing his target price on the company's shares to $46 from $76 and arguing that its long-in-the-tooth handset portfolio has cost it the consumer market.

"'We no longer anticipate Research in Motion recovering to participate in the mainstream of smartphone industry growth,' he said. 'Our long-term forecast anticipates a role supplying business-oriented devices, both mid-range and high end, as well as cloud-based services via the BlackBerry Network. We expect the consumer mix gained over the past two years to churn off, and that earnings will decline after 2013 and eventually grow again on demand that is largely associated with business users.'"

Patent-holding firm Lodsys goes after Android developer for use of in-app payments >> ReadWriteWeb

Links to a Google group discussion of Android developers: one who has implemented in-app payment (which Lodsys claims a patent on) says he's been served.

Why it's harder to make money on Android than on Apple's iOS >> Fortune Tech

"Apple's App Store is generating billions for developers, while hardly anybody is getting rich in the Android Market.In a new report issued Friday, Distimo looks at why that might be. One obvious factor -- not highlighted in April -- is that there are nearly three times as many paid apps on Apple's App Store (211,369, by Distimo's count) as on Google's (71,801).
"What Distimo discovered this time is that, for a variety of reasons, Android generates far fewer runaway hits. The most successful app in the Android Market, with more than 50 million downloads, is a Google freebie: Google Maps. Nothing else comes close."

Google knocks Yahoo! off display ad top spot >> StrategyEye

"Google is now the largest online display advertiser in the US in terms of revenues, knocking Yahoo! off its perch, according to figures from IDC. The report shows Google overtaking Yahoo! with 14.7% of the market in Q1 2011, up from 13.3% in the same period last year. Overall, the display advertising market boomed in the first quarter, with ad revenues hitting $7.3bn - the highest Q1 revenue for the industry ever, according to figures from the IAB and PwC.
"Yahoo!'s market share is dropping almost as quickly as Google's is rising, dropping to 12.3%, down from 13.3% last year. This makes Google market leader in both display advertising and search, where it is the long-established number one. This shift comes as search ad revenues are squeezed by display, which now has a higher market worth."

Tricky for Yahoo, which makes its money serving ads.

You can follow Guardian Technology's linkbucket on delicious

Josh Hallidayguardian.co.uk

Majority of both Palestinians and Israeli expect new intifada

Polls show around 70% foresee uprising among Palestinians if no progress in peace talks and following declaration of state

Two polls earlier this month gave strikingly similar results on one question: do you think a third intifada (Palestinian uprising) is looming?

An Israeli poll for The Peace Index found that 70% of Jews in Israel expect a popular uprising following the expected declaration of a Palestinian state in September and its possible recognition by the UN. (62% of Israeli-Arabs also think an intifada is likely.)

A poll for the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion found that 70.5% of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza believe an intifada will break out if the deadlock in negotiations continues.

It looks very much as though all these scenarios will come to pass: the deadlock will indeed continue, the Palestinians will declare their state and a majority of countries at the UN General Assembly will back it.

There is increasing talk of what happens after that, and whether – if nothing much changes on the ground – Palestinians will follow their Arab brothers and sisters and try to force change by their own actions.

Even before September, there may be a rise in activity. Following the Nakba Day protests by Palestinian refugees on the border with Lebanon and the fence between the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights and Syria, a similar demonstration has been called for this Sunday, June 5, to mark the anniversary of the Six Day War.

There is also another international flotilla of aid ships setting sail towards Gaza later in June.

The Israeli military are preparing for these events by reviewing their response to non-violent actions and how they can contain demonstrations without courting international criticism for heavy-handed suppression. Fourteen people were shot dead on Nakba Day; nine were killed on board the Mavi Mamara exactly a year ago.

Back to the polls. Aside from the intifada question, the headlines from the Palestinian poll are: almost 80% back the reconciliation deal between Fatah and Hamas; 44.7% believe the Israelis are not interested in making peace, 45.5% say they are to a degree and another 8.4% say they are without qualification; 69.6% either strongly or somewhat oppose the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel, and 29.8% either strongly or somewhat support such actions.

Among the Israeli Jews polled, 75% believe a majority of countries at the UN General Assembly will recognise a Palestinian state, and around the same number believe that will be followed by increased pressure on Israel by the international community, including economic sanctions, to end the occupation.

On negotiations, 38% say they should resume even if Hamas is part of a new Palestinian government; 35% say Israel should not talk if Hamas is included; and 24% oppose negotiations regardless of who is in the Palestinian government.

Both these polls were taken before President Obama made his speech saying that a future Palestinian state should be based on the pre-1967 borders and discouraging the Palestinians from taking their demand for recognition to the UN.

Since that speech, and Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu's robust rejection of the 1967 line, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz published a poll showing that 47% of the Israeli public viewed Netanyahu's trip to Washington as a success, and only 10% thought it a failure.

More than a quarter – 27% - said they believed relations between Israel and the US would improve as a result of the trip; 13% thought they would deteriorate.

• Comments on this article are set to remain open do 12 hours after publication but may close overnight

IsraelPalestinian territoriesGazaMiddle East peace talksBarack ObamaBinyamin NetanyahuHarriet Sherwoodguardian.co.uk

Blogging with the north’s ‘Valleywag’ and other MediaCity tales

This week's round-up of news and views from around MediaCity in Salford

When it comes to blogging MediaCityUK, I'm the first to admit to being something of a Johnny-come-lately. Michael Tabner, a 25-year-old full time web designer at Manual Link Building based in Altrincham, has already been at it for more than three years.

He's established a loyal following with his unofficial MediaCity dedicated blog attracting between 3 and 4,000 unique visitors a month and almost 5,000 Twitter followers. I caught up with him to find out more.

Q: When did you start the blog and why?
A: I started the blog in March 2008. I was working down the road from Salford Quays at the time and was following the news of Peel forming this bid for BBC North. As it became obvious that Salford was going to win the bid and this 'media city' was going to happen I thought there would be a need for a dedicated news site, amongst other things.

I registered a few domains and posted some simple articles and left it sit for a while. After around six months the site was pulling regular traffic, and it became obvious to me there were many people like myself who were interested in the project and wanted regular updates. From there it's just been a case of regularly covering stories or updates I found most interesting, and the site and twitter/facebook accounts have ballooned from there.

Q: Who is the blog for?
A: The blog is for anybody who is interested in MediaCity. most of our traffic comes from Manchester and London, and I know from a lot of emails I've got that it's become popular amongst BBC staff making the move or thinking about making the move. Around Manchester there are plenty of people interested in what's going on, mainly people interested in employment opportunities.

Q: Why do you do it - what's it for?
A: I do it because I'm personally interested in the development of the project, and in seeing how successful (or not) the whole thing becomes. As staff move into media city and other business take space I hope the focus will shift from the debates about staff moving or costs to programmes being made, exciting collaborations and events etc. 

I remember the first MD of media city describing it as the new 'Silicon Valley' - and as such I thought there would be a need for a media city techcrunch.com equivalent to cover businesses based there, or even a Valleywag. (I think Silicon Valley is a pretty ambitious target and MediaCity isn't really comparable, but you get the idea!)
Keep up with his MediaCity blog here.


Recent headlines from MediaCityUK

*The BBC's employment plans and practices are currently coming under some scrutiny. On Thursday Guardian columnist and former Panorama editor and ITV Carlton production director Steve Hewlett will be in Manchester to proffer some of his controversial opinions on the BBC's move to its new base, reports HowDo. The pro manchester's annual lecture is at MOSI's new Revolution Gallery on 2 June.

Meanwhile the Salford Star is pointing up the disparity between the money being paid out to the consultant in charge of finding work at MediaCityUK for people from 'deprived' areas compared to the money paid to the Salford youngsters for 'ambassador' roles. It writes that consultant Chris Marsh gets paid £46,800 for 12 days work a month on a six month contract, local young people are offered six month jobs at the BBC for £3.64 or £4.92 an hour.
The newsite says: "This story was brought to the Salford Star by a mum who lives in a 'deprived' area of Salford, disgusted that her daughter was asked to work for such rates while so much money was being paid to consultants, and BBC staff who can keep their London weighting while working in Salford."

* The University of Salford has announced a new partnership focusing on research and innovation with leading digital marketing agency Fast Web Media.The partnership will also provide opportunities for Salford students to take up internships and short-term placements and to gain experience working with Fast Web Media experts. Stuart Wells, Director of Management Development Programmes for Salford Business School, said: "Search and social media marketing is one of the fastest growing areas in the whole digital marketing arena and this is a fantastic opportunity to formalise the already great relationship we have with Fast Web Media."

* The man in charge of Studios at MediaCityUK has been talking about the stereotypes he's encountered about moving north. Speaking at last week's HowDo awards Andy Waters took to the stage to praise his newly-adopted region.
"Before I came, a lot of people talked about stereotypes about what you lot are like. How friendly you all are, how people will come and chat to you on the tram, or invite you in for a cup of tea. But what they also said is just how passionate you all are about this region and about this industry, and that is very evident in this room."

*The BBC announces that Helen Bullough has been appointed as Head of CBBC Production with responsibility for all in house production for CBBC in MediaCityUK. She'll lead a team of more than 200 staff, creating shows such as Blue Peter, Newsround, Tracy Beaker Returns, Legend Of Dick And Dom and Serious Explorers.

* The official MediaCity blog announced that four new companies have taken office space at the Greenhouse development at Media City in Salford Quays. Libra Television, digital business development advisor Peachy, Armstrong Legal and Kelly's Eye Animation are the latest tenants to join Dreamscope Productions.

* Liverpool-based Splinter has been celebrating the contract to design and build the BBC North website: "It's a big strategic move for the BBC and we were chuffed when we won the pitch to design and build the new BBC North website. It went live last week, and is full of information about the move, as well as audio & video content, event listings and profiles of a wide variety of BBC staff members."

We'll be bringing you regular updates from MediaCity (Subscribe to RSS here) so if you have any news or views to share please feel free to mention it via the comments below or contact me on Twitter or email.

MediaCityUKSarah Hartleyguardian.co.uk

Is Microsoft getting $5 per HTC Android handset sold? We asked HTC…

Calculations based on analyst's report suggest that Google's free mobile operating system is doing better for Microsoft than its own mobile OS. So, is it?

Who's making money out of Android? Some carriers (because people are buying smartphones), perhaps some handset makers, one or two app developers, and possibly Google through ancillary services such as search and maps.

Oh, and Microsoft. Very much Microsoft.

That's right: according to a briefing note from Walter Pritchard, an analyst at Citi, Microsoft is getting $5 per Android handset sold by HTC following a patent settlement over intellectual property infringement in April 2010 relating to Android. And continuing lawsuits by Microsoft against other handset makers are reportedly seeking between $7.50 and $12.50 per device sold using Android as well.

That could turn into a profitable sideline for Microsoft, since Android has the biggest share of the smartphone market. In fact Horace Dediu of Asymco calculated that based on 30m HTC Android devices shipped, at $5 each to Microsoft, that's $150m for Microsoft. Compare that to 2m Windows Phone licences at an estimated $15 per phone, that's around $30m. (I think the figure is slightly higher now - 2.3m to the end of the first quarter - but it doesn't shift the figure much.)

That's five times as much income from Android than from Windows Phone. If Microsoft can get the same sort of settlement from other Android handset makers, then the mobile phone business could turn into a good profit centre for it - because it gets this levy without having to do any work, not even software development. And that money is also available to be funnelled to Nokia, which is going to install Windows Phone. So HTC is helping out Nokia.

Now, I think it's important when we see stories like this to check them with the sources. So I put in a call to HTC to ask whether it agreed with the $5 estimate put forward by Pritchard. First reaction: "oh, that sounds far too high. I don't think we'd be paying that."

A few hours later, I got the official statement. Are you ready for it? Here it comes.

"Last year, HTC and Microsoft did announce a licensing agreement for Android handsets. Such agreements are not unusual in the wireless industry, and as is the case with all such agreements, HTC does not disclose financial terms."

HTC is in all likelihood completely banned from discussing the amounts of the settlement, because to do so would affect Microsoft's potential to win higher amounts in any future patent licensing agreements it wins from other handset makers. It's tempting to think that HTC hasn't confirmed the $5 figure because it's correct - but it could still be two or three times too high.

Yet even in that case, that still means that Microsoft has received far more money from Android licensing than from its own phones, so far. Don't expect that to change much between now and October, when we expect the first Nokia "Nokindows" phone. And with HTC's success continuing, it might even become a large enough number to show up in HTC's accounts. We'll keep a look out. And in the meantime we'll savour the irony.

MicrosoftSmartphonesIntellectual propertyMobile phonesAndroidWindows PhoneCharles Arthurguardian.co.uk

London week ahead: Ken in Boris country

As this post goes live I'm checking my route by bus and train from near the heart of Hackney to the very core of Bromley, where later this morning I'll encounter a man named Livingstone. Will he be feeling lost in an electoral wilderness? Ken, of course, has been a big figure in London politics for years. Yet Greater London's biggest borough is resistant to his charms.

Why? Socially, it's deeply suburban. Politically, it's hugely Tory. Psychologically, it's part of Kent. At the last mayoral election, Bromley preferred Boris Johnson by more than three votes to one. There's no way Ken will turn that round. But if he can close the massive margin by just a few percent, it will spell trouble for the man who hoofed him out of City Hall in 2008 - such a swing replicated across town would do for him. A bigger Labour vote is out there. I'll be reporting on Ken's attempt to woo it.

Also this week: a look at the Mayor's London 2012 sporting legacy programme; a closer examination of the Mayor's New Bus for London; and a report on the Mayor's performance at Thursday's annual State of London debate at the Methodist Central Hall. What a lucky Mayor he is to be getting so much attention. And now it's time to catch that Number 48.

London politicsBoris JohnsonLondonKen LivingstoneDave Hillguardian.co.uk

Red kite killings in Cumbria

A third bird found dead, just as the county tries to increase its tourist trade. And why the Yorkshire Sculpture Park is a top day out.

One of the modern pleasures of living in north Leeds is the wheeling, magnificent presence of red kites, reintroduced after more than a century's absence, via a sanctuary on the Harewood estate.

Every time I take the A658 or A61 towards Harrogate, I know for certain that I'll see at least a pair, with their foxy colouring, plus black and white wing stripes, and boldly forked tails.

So I'm rooting for police in Cumbria who are on the trail of misguided locals (a polite description) who have killed three red kites since September. As in Leeds, and also Gateshead where one famous family nests next door to a supermarket, the birds have been reintroduced from a safe haven in Grizedale forest.

There is no reason to go after them. As PC John Shaw, Cumbria police's wildlife and rural environmental crime officer, says: "It is very difficult and disturbing to have to try to understand why anyone would want to harm these birds. They're just a scavenging bird and will go for what's easy - carrion – rather than trying to take livestock or game."

The Forestry Commission's Iain Yoxall, the wildlife ranger who runs the Grizedale release programme, believes that the killings – two shootings and a poisoning - are down to old-fashioned ideas regarding birds of prey. He says: "It's something that goes back centuries, when people regarded kites as a
threat to livestock or as competition for food."

They are neither. Instead, they help to bring in Cumbria's most important economic resource – visitors to the Lake District and its quieter, surrounding countryside. Their persecutor is managing the pointless feat of shooting not only birds, but themselves and their neighbours in the foot.

Heads you win

It was raining steadily but the main car park was full at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park today and the secondary one was reaching capacity when my wife and I marched off to admire Jaume Plensa's enormous heads.

The Spanish sculptor's exhibition is a real treat; and I can't get too much of the park itself. Every time, you make a new discovery; on this occasion the Alice-in-Wonderland boltholes of the 'natural playground' which wind right into the heart of a huge stand of rhododendrons and yews opposite the mansion of Bretton Hall.

It's a shame, though, to see the buildings of the former Leeds University college standing empty; the alma mater of such talents as Kay Mellor and the League of Gentlemen. The hall itself is due to become a swanky hotel when the recession eases; I hope that the 1960s extensions will be saved in the process.

They are tatty at the moment (like the very similar ones at Wentworth Woodhouse mansion near Rotherham, which formerly housed the Lady Mabel college for women PE teachers – whose annual dance was one of Yorkshire's hottest tickets). But another decade or so, and their architecture will be coming into fashion. It adds to the extraordinary mixture of old and new, tradition and innovation, which is central to the surrounding sculpture park.

And the robot mower on the grass roof of the underground gallery is to die for. Even in the rain today, it looked like a giant, jewelled beetle creeping randomly about.

Martin Wainwrightguardian.co.uk

Game of Thrones: season one, episode seven

Gratuitous sex, brutal slaughter and a disembowled deer brighten up an episode in which trouble looms for King Robert

Spoiler alert: Don't read on unless you have watched the first seven episodes of Game of Thrones on Sky Atlantic. For the purposes of this blog we are also going to (hopefully) avoid book spoilers as well.

Sarah Hughes' episode six blog

"At least they can say I did this one thing right"

It's not much of an epitaph but at least it's an honest one. King Robert Baratheon expired much as he'd lived, not entirely sober and with one last earthy quip ("murdered by a pig"). It was a sad yet strangely fitting end and a compelling performance from Mark Addy. There was always something in Robert of the fading middle-aged former athlete run to fat and seeking solace in drink. In the real world he would probably have ended up in midlife crisis and divorce, but this is Westeros and thus, despite his belated attempts to make amends, Robert's untimely demise looks set to plunge the realm into chaos.

"All the power is yours, you need only to reach out and take it"

If Robert's death was inevitable, so too was Ned's downfall. By the end of the episode the situation was as follows: stubbornly adhering to his moral code in the face of all survival instincts Ned has sent word to Stannis, Robert's oldest brother, to come and claim the throne. Meanwhile, Renly has headed south with Loras Tyrell presumably to use the Tyrell gold to back his claim, the Lannisters are hanging around with an army that they will use to back Joffrey ("Anyone who isn't us is our enemy") and Dany has convinced Khal Drogo to get on a boat which means we have four possible claimants to the throne and one isolated former Hand of the King. It couldn't really get much worse.

"He knows he's better than other men, he's always known it deep down inside"

Of all those at court no one moved quicker to secure their position than Petyr Littlefinger. I love Aidan Gillen's portrayal of the weaselly brothel owner but feel that Benioff and Weiss over-played their hand here. While the scene in which he confessed his true feelings was clever (despite the entirely gratuitous girl-on-girl sex) and I enjoyed having his personality peeled back to reveal the rodent within, it also robbed the final moments of some of their power. Ultimately I wasn't surprised Littlefinger betrayed Ned because he'd all but said he was going to do so 15 minutes in.

"I want you to become the man you were always meant to be"

We finally met Tywin Lannister, father to Cersei, Jaime and Tyrion this week, and it was some introduction. Whether skinning and disembowelling a deer (another heavy-handed bit of symbolism given the deer is the sign of House Baratheon) or adeptly carving up Jaime's character ("go on say something clever"), Tywin (wonderfully played by Charles Dance) made cruelty seem almost reasonable while making me feel slightly sorry for his children.

"I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls… I pledge my life and honour to the Night's Watch, for this night and all the nights to come"

In an all-action episode the most powerful moment was, however, a quiet one as Sam and Jon said their vows and in doing so sent a shiver up my spine. I've loved all the scenes at The Wall and this was no different. You really believe in Jon and Sam's relationship (I all but cheered when Sam pointed out that Jon was basically being an arse about being passed over for the Rangers), and root for them to succeed, even though the sense of foreboding about what lurks beyond The Wall gets stronger with each passing week.

Additional thoughts

I loved this episode despite the absence of Tyrion and a couple of clunky moments. The plot is rolling unstoppably forward and it's hard not to spend most of the time on the edge of the sofa yelling "Noooo".

The scenes across the Narrow Sea continue to improve, particularly the moment where Jorah decided whether to save Dany or not, weighing his love for his lost homeland against the death of a girl. It was perfectly calibrated and all the more compelling for the fact that you genuinely weren't sure which way he would go.

Following the killing of Viserys last week it was good to see Jason Momoa continue to do more than strip, glower and have sex. His impassioned speech about the kingdom he would gift his unborn son certainly got the horde on side although it's worth noting that Dany looked somewhat less convinced at the idea of reclaiming the Seven Kingdoms only to raze it to the ground and enslave its people.

There were shades of Caligula about Joffrey's performance on the Iron Throne. It's clear he's going to need a firm hand but how likely is it that he will get one? Also what will happen to Sansa's proposed marriage now that her father has been arrested?

Violence count

One bloody deer disembowelling, one wine merchant beaten and forced to walk naked while tied to Dany's horse, one death of a king, one severed hand discovered by a rarely spotted Direwolf and the brutal slaughter of the last men left in the capital foolish enough to be loyal to Ned Stark.

Nudity count

One use of girl-on-girl sex as apparent metaphor for Petyr Littlefinger's philosophy of life, one attempt at a "special" master/servant relationship from Theon and one full-frontal shot of a naked and bloody wine merchant forced to walk behind Dany's horse.

Random Brit of the week

This week's award goes to the great character actor Peter Vaughan (or as my husband excitedly shouted "that bloke out of Porridge"). We had already met him briefly as Maester Aemon but this week he came into his own while rebuking Jon.

So did you miss Tyrion? What did you make of Tywin? Will Ned find a way through this mess? Given that she grabbed Tyrion because of Bran, how will Catelyn react now? What about Arya and Sansa? Finally who will be the next resident of Westeros to explain themselves to the accompaniment of two whores moaning? As ever, wade in below.

Game of ThronesTelevisionDramaFantasySarah Hughesguardian.co.uk

F1′s red-flag rules need tune-up after robbing Monaco of feisty finish | Giles Richards

Monaco could have had the finale it deserved if tyre changes were restricted to rainy conditions during race stoppages

Without doubt Sebastian Vettel is a fine driver and will have taken huge pleasure from his win in the Monaco Grand Prix on Sunday, yet there is a sense, through no fault of his own, that the victory ought to be marked with an asterisk in the record books because of an air of what might have been hanging over the race.

A tiny doubt was cast by the tyre change allowed when the race was red-flagged six laps from the end. It was perfectly within the rules and applicable to all the teams, but robbed fans of a potentially spectacular finish and Vettel of the chance to pull off a victory that would have made the history, as well as the record books.

By lap 72 the race, which had already eclipsed the usual Monaco procession with incident, intrigue and overtaking, was deliciously poised. Vettel led Fernando Alonso by just over a second with Jenson Button immediately behind them. Vettel had gambled on making only one stop, asking more of his tyres than anyone had expected. Alonso, who was two-stopping, had reeled the leader in and was quicker on newer tyres, while Button, on a three-stop strategy, had the freshest boots of all and was challenging them both.

Just before the race was stopped the BBC had reported McLaren engineers as predicting Vettel's tyres were about to "fall off the cliff". A fight to the finish involving Vettel trying to stay on track and ahead was guaranteed and, had his tyres given up the ghost and he with them, would have left Alonso and Button vying for the win – a mouth-watering prospect whichever scenario had ensued.

But it was not to be. With the cars parked on the grid, the tyres were changed and, with performance equalised by fresh rubber for all, the finish was a straight five-lap sprint ending, predictably, with the positions unchanged.

The rule allowing work on the cars, and specifically to change tyres under red-flag conditions, has its origins in concerns for safety. Red flags most often occur because of the onset of very heavy rain, which requires competitors to take on grooved tyres. It's an essential rule but one that now seems ripe for some fine tuning according to circumstance. It would not be too much to expect the race director to decide, given specific race conditions, whether a tyre change is necessary for safety purposes or not.

If, as was the case at Monaco, work on the cars or tyre changes are not needed for safety then surely they could, and should, be left alone, with engineers or mechanics unable to take advantage of an unexpected situation that may then have a direct impact on how the race plays out. As it did here, where we were denied a mighty climax – in contrast to the finale of a gripping Indy

Sarah Palin and the seven dwarves: the Republican presidential nightmare | Richard Adams

Is Sarah Palin going to run for the presidency in 2012? There are two big clues: everything she says and everything she does

Like many typical American families, Sarah Palin and her family spent the Memorial Day holiday weekend sightseeing – and kicking off a nationwide bus tour that will presumably culminate in the announcement of her 2012 presidential bid.

Although there remains a scintilla of doubt that Palin will actually go for the Republican presidential nomination, so far there are two big clues that she is running: everything she says and everything she does.

While the rest of America was eyeing the nearest swimming pool and firing up barbecues, Palin was joining a military veterans biker rally in DC – shouting "I love that smell of the emissions!" – followed by an early morning trip to see the Constitution at the National Archives, then a visit to George Washington's house at Mt Vernon, to be followed by a trip to Gettysburg battlefield.

Other than hand out bumper stickers saying "Palin for President", what more she could do? National "listening tours" are a staple of US presidential politics. This time Palin doesn't even have a book or a TV series to promote. That only leaves one thing to sell: her political future.

Palin's "One Nation" bus tour will, according to the scant details on her various outlets, visit "historic sites" and "patriotic events," and travel through New England "in the coming weeks".

Entirely unrelated fact: New England includes New Hampshire, which is the site of the first Republican presidential primary in early 2012.

With the bus tour and hagiographical documentary, I think at this point we can assume Palin is going to run for the Republican nomination, unless tourists at Gettysburg start pelting her with tomatoes (unlikely) or her bus runs over a cute kitten named Mr Mittens live on Fox News (improbable).

I've said it before: Palin would be crazy not to run for the Republican nomination. Just look at the rest of the field. Since evangelicals' sweetheart Mike Huckabee declined to run, the path is clear for Palin on the Tea Party/Christian wing. The three identikit Republican ex-governors running – Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty and Jon Huntsman – squabble among themselves and split the centre-moderate-establishment vote. Palin crushes them all in South Carolina, the traditional Republican bellwether. Game over?

That scenario was sketched out for me by a Virginia Republican who is tepidly backing Romney – "Because there's no one else." He, like a lot of Republicans, is still waiting for a knight on a white horse to sweep into the race, Rick Perry of Texas being the most common name given to the knight, although Jeb Bush is also wistfully mentioned. The trouble is, time is running out and knights are in short supply.

How bad have things got for the Republican party? This bad: Rudy Giuliani is thinking about running. Yes, Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City who failed spectacularly in his 2008 attempt after a campaign of bungling ineffectiveness.

As two leading candidates, Huckabee and Mitch Daniel, have announced they won't be running, so far the serious part of the GOP field has narrowed down to the law firm of Romney, Huntsman and Pawlenty, which individually or collectively generate little excitement among the grassroots. In fact, an obscure pizza magnate named Herman Cain and perennial candidate Ron Paul are showing more signs of a pulse. Paul retains the libertarian-leaning base that backed him with gusto in 2008, while Cain is the latest breath of fresh air, likely to soon go stale.

Back in 1988 the lacklustre field of Democratic presidential contenders was derided as "the seven dwarfs". They ended up with Michael Dukakis as the party's nominee. The 2012 Republicans go one better in that they have a Snow White in Alaska's former governor, alongside Pawlenty, Huntsman, Romney, Cain, Paul, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum (the last two may as well not bother once Palin enters the contest).

The test as always with Palin is whether she can focus and harness the support she gets from her fanbase. Modern campaigns still rely upon generating enthusiasm – in part to raise money from donors, in part to knock on doors, but most importantly to inspire potential supporters to actually get out and vote in primaries. As the only Republican in the race with rock-star appeal, Palin can do all three. Whether she will or not – well, we'll soon find out.

Update: No sooner have I posted this blog than Real Clear Politics site reveals that Palin's tour will include Iowa, the site of the very first Republican contest in 2012:

Though Palin has insisted that her "One Nation" bus tour – being kicked off from Washington over the holiday weekend – is intended merely to "highlight America's foundation," RCP has learned that the road trip was designed as a test run to find out whether she can execute a decidedly unconventional campaign game plan.

She's running, right?

Sarah PalinUS elections 2012RepublicansMitt RomneyTim PawlentyJon HuntsmanUS politicsUnited StatesRichard Adamsguardian.co.uk
Traveling to Russia travel to Moscow, for housing pay for kvart-hotel.com Hey. want say many about A5 flyers here u may have שיש למטבחים Bob searches for effective Sage CRM support here. Light apartment in odessa seek site. Аренда микроавтобуса в Москве I've found effective MacCleaner here. Ultram no prescription